But the less intelligent a program is, the more YOU have to be, by assessing what to expect from it and finding ways of getting it to give you something as close as possible to what you want. as intelligent as me) to process "any and every image thrown at it" the way I exactly want. If iResizer asks you to register before saving, rerun Activate.exe (before the end of the MikeR: You are definitely right about the limits of iResizer's "intelligence", but I do not expect any computer program to be intelligent enough (i.e. I repeat also what I said a year ago (and, actually, it doesn't apply to this giveaway only): do not trust what GOTD pop up or the "About" says, you are not sure that your program is registered until you have successfully saved a modified image. I already said that I would prefer the red brush for areas that should not be changed and the green one for areas that can be, instead of the opposite, but that's me :) I can understand why developers prefer to keep their changelogs very private when they do nothing else than fix bugs, but why not advertise real enhancements?! Nothing about it on TeoreX site at first glance.
TEOREX IRESIZER REVIEWS SOFTWARE
Hopefully its sister software InPaint will follow soon.
IResizer now supporting transparency (and it does it perfectly) is no big news for you if you use it on your photos only, but for those who go for graphics and working with layers, it is a BIIG improvement. Sometimes the result is OK and sometimes not. That said results will vary considerably with subject matter and areas selected for preservation and deletion, on that topic it is likely we will make more than one attempt at it until we get a desired result, that means we need the "resize" operation to be as fast as technically possible, at the moment it is not, currently I am seeing the process is single threaded, at most using 52% of a dual core CPU and I would imagine maxing at around 26% of a quad core cpu, the extra 1 or 2% usage being some ancillary operation that only uses a small amount of CPU but is multi-core aware maybe file I/O? I think the developers should next look into multi-threading the resize operation and once it had been broken down into multithread freindly units they could look into GPU acceleration as well since most modern computers have able GPU's just sitting there almost idle, maximising the use of available processing ability will make the program far more usable especially when processing photos greater than 8 megapixels IMHO.
TEOREX IRESIZER REVIEWS HOW TO
That said results will vary considerably with subject matter and areas selected for preservation and deletion, on that topic it is likely we will make more than one attempt at it until we get a desired result, that means we need the "resize" operation to be as fast as technically possible, at the moment it is not, currently I am seeing the process is single threaded, at most using 52% of a dual core CPU and I would imagine maxing at around 26% of a quad core cpu, the extra 1 or 2% usage being some ancillary operation that only uses a small amount of CPU but is multi-core aware maybe file I/O? I think the developers should next look into multi-threading the resize operation and once it had been broken down into multithread freindly units they could look into GPU acceleration as well since most modern computers have able GPU's just sitting there almost idle, maximising the use of available processing ability will make the program far more usable especially when processing photos greater than 8 megapixels IMHO.īearing in mind that inteligence is a relative measurement, this does what it says on the tin so to speak, obviously it cannot beat the eye and human inteligence in deciding how to morph or cut the regions but it does what it does faster than human mind can get any graphics package to do it manually with conventional select and resize selection or other conventional tools including redraw with a brush.
Bearing in mind that inteligence is a relative measurement, this does what it says on the tin so to speak, obviously it cannot beat the eye and human inteligence in deciding how to morph or cut the regions but it does what it does faster than human mind can get any graphics package to do it manually with conventional select and resize selection or other conventional tools including redraw with a brush.
0 kommentar(er)
